About Us. Contact Us. Antenna Tips. Latest Newscasts. Investigate TV. Gray DC Bureau. By Jake Wallace. Published: Nov. Share on Facebook. Email This Link. Share on Twitter. Share on Pinterest. Share on LinkedIn. Most Read. Are the Bears as good on defense right now as the Rams and Jaguars?
I would argue no. Those teams have more playmakers on that side of the ball, in my opinion. But the Bears have been solid on defense and have an opportunity to make some upgrades. I heard that the Bengals want to convert John Ross into CB, given the speed he has, would be wise for the Bears to pull a trade for him and make him a possible deep threat? Ross played only 17 snaps as a rookie after Cincinnati selected him with the ninth overall pick last year.
There was some chatter that the Bengals were considering moving him to defense, but that was just talk. They have a new wide receivers coach in Bob Bicknell and Ross will remain at wide receiver where the Bengals will try to take advantage of his elite speed.
Why is Mitch Trubisky living with Jared Goff this offseason? The comparisons are obvious, but one good year does not mean he is a great mentor. What do you think of this plan for the O-line? Cut Sitton and Massie. Keep Leno at LT. Keep Whitehair at center. Sign Andrew Norwell for RG. Draft Quenton Nelson for LG. Move Long to RT Hiestand should help him make this transition. Cut Sitton and Massie?
These are unrelated issues. Keep Leno at LT? Yes, I would expect Charles Leno to be the starting left tackle. Keep Whitehair at center?
There will be discussions about whether Cody Whitehair is best at center or guard. Sign Andrew Norwell for RG? Draft Quenton Nelson for LG? Move Long to RT Hiestand should help him make this transition? Drafting Nelson would make sense. Why keep trying to assign him a new position? Twitter BradBiggs. Skip to content. Roster rundown: Jordan Howard's skills could be perfect fit in Bears new offense ». Roster rundown: Wide receivers missed the mark leaving Bears with much work to do ».
A long line move especially again rooks in the corners are practically invisible. So they wouldn't be looking for this kind of move anyway. If it were true what you say, the best advice for beginners would be: don't play. The only way to avoid such errors is to develop board vision and to calculate two moves ahead.
Anything else is voodoo. I think doing tactics puzzles is a popular way to hone these skills, so the OP might want to indulge in this kind of exercise. Playing online games and using a real chess board to play through possible continuations may be another way.
True about full board vision. I have been recommended books on tactics in another thread, i basically learned the moves and then read a few games books. Never really read tactics. I played those games in the wrong frame of mind too I think. Oh well not afraid to learn by making a prat of myself in front of thousands of readers here lol. I think the funny thing is many of my opponents calculate this out and incorrectly evaluate the final position as white winning.
If you play the sicillian and get early "scholars mate attempts" as I like to call them this is a line I would strongly reccomend you memorize. In addition, white will often occupying the next few of his moves attack the pawn on c4. If you don't bother defending it b5 is not a good idea, I've looked at tons of variations of white attacking the c pawn and it almost always is a blunder and just develope you can get far ahead.
Forums Chess Openings. Apr 21, 1. Apr 21, 2. Apr 21, 3. Knight f6 prevents a lot of queen sorties. I hope that helps.
Apr 21, 4. While I might not be the strongest player on the battlefield I can tell you this much: You can either memorise every single book opening mainline down to the 20th move OR You can play every single move you make by principle. When you look at the board, look at it like a puzzle, the puzzle is: What is the best move? Apr 21, 5. Apr 21, 6. Apr 21, 7. Can anyone recommend a decent book on tactics which is not to dense and Jargon filled? Apr 21, 8. Apr 21, 9.
Apr 21, Wezzyfish wrote: I've almost never been able to get an easy quick checkmate with the king's gambit, and wouldn't risk the chance for it anyway. Apr 30, Why would you play 5. It just gives away a pawn for nothing. Why not 5. Nc3, simply developing a piece? Was there a threat of taking on a2? No, because you would have just taken back with the rook. May 1,
0コメント